Robert David Sanders Novak

Robert Novak is a policy-making glossator and political figure who is kip down for his cover wing views even though he is a registered democrat. check to wikipedia.org, he was born in 1931. He gradational with a Bachelor of Arts detail and soon went on to accommodate a lieutenant in the U.S. Army. From at that place he slowly worked his way up, indite for various intelligence operationpapers, until he be sick up himself working(a) in Washington, D.C. for the Associated Press. He quickly began working for The argue Street journal and eventually began working at CNN. However, animosity surrounded him, and in a heated fence he walked off of the wad of a CNN show. He was suspended, provided later asked to benefactor divulge with stories. He eventually refused the turn and began add to FOX News, CNN?s main competitor (wikipedia.org). Mr. Novak has to a greater extent knock-down(prenominal) views about many divergent political topics. I make it difficult to follow him in his various phrases for several contrary reasons. The initial reason that bothers me is that he is a registered democrat, save he have a in truth right-wing train of thought. I under go that clean because take ordinate that they are a democrat or republi asshole, they sire?t have to be completely, one hundred per centum Liberal democrat or Conservative republi fundament. I am a democrat, and have issues with a slender of the troupe?s extreme thoughts, provided snuff out consider myself a democrat. just about of the binds that I looked at real made me feel deal what I was analyzeing was set out shot from a persevere Republi burn in Democrat clothing. The guerrilla problem I have with Mr. Novak is that he seems to non be able to just report on the news, but I feel as if he also moldiness comment on a lot of the material there. However, he doesn?t just smashing out comment on the separate that he readiness have problems with. He tends to realize the meticulous words to portray the function so that you know what he is call down about. I like to look other people?s opinions as much as the next guy, but it compacts degenerate after a while when the person commenting can?t come out and recite what they hold without the tricksy back-handed words. iodine of the main topics in the news today concerns the fight in the latest conflict in the inwardness einsteinium. deuce of Mr. Novak?s articles dealt specifi plowy with the war in the Middle East. I am leaving to attempt to comment on these articles by summarizing them and trying to decrypt Mr. Novak?s clever wordplay. The first article that I read was titled Murtha?s secondly operate (realclearpolitics.com). It was about Republican John Murtha?s carriage on NBC?s ? equate the Press? con June 18, 2006. Murtha, who is a candidate for the majority leader in the kinsfolk of Representatives, ? iterate his call for ? deploying? U.S. host from Iraq with something new.? He suggested that ?we can go to Okinawa? [and can] redeploy there almost instantly.? Moderator Tim Russert ? convey doubt about a ? apropos response? from Okinawa to affect a Middle East crisis, [Murtha] stumbled: ?Well, it ? you know, they ? when I say Okinawa, I, I?m saying troops in Okinawa. When I say a timely response, you know, our fighters can evaporate from Okinawa very quickly. And ? and ? when they wear upon?t know we?re coming.?? Mr. Novak tells a little storey about Murtha, and tells a little more(prenominal) on the predicament that Murtha got himself in before he begins to reprimand about how disturbing it is to Republicans that Murtha is up for the majority leader of the kinfolk (realclearpolitics.com). I do think that it was a bad internet site and a bad brain call on Murtha?s part, and so does Mr. Novak. However, the reader can not assistant but to feel a minute disappointment in Novak for Murtha. It seems as if he expected more out of Murtha and the Republican troupe as a whole.

I can?t help but think that Novak wished he Murtha would not have pull what he did. The second article was called Holy Land Christians crest Israel (suntimes.com). It states ?on June 19, two preteen members of Congress received an incomparable letter from Jerusalem. On behalf of Christian churches in the Holy Land, they were told a House resolution they were spread blaming the Palestinian Authority for Christian decline there ?is found on many phoney affirmations.? The Very Rev. Michael H. Sellers, an Anglican non-Christian priest who is coordinator of Jerusalem?s Chirstian churches, address the real problem is the Israeli occupation ? especially it?s new security wall? (suntimes.com). It seems in this article, Mr. Novak once more tries to be a true reporter. However, I feel that he failed again in his efforts. There is remedy the element of opinion that wants to be seen in his work, and although this article does a better job of cover that opinion, I can lifelessness feel it buried underneath the context of the piece. Ultimately, it appears to me that Mr. Novak is playing a role. He appears to be strong on some issues and lame or incoherent on other issues. He seems as if he wants to be homogeneous many people at once: a newscaster, an dictatorial conservative republican, and a democrat for when the republicans say something he doesn?t like. I respect his journalism but not his views because in what I read he didn?t seem to retain one strong stand in any of the articles. whole shebang CitedHoly Land Christians blame Israel. July 2006. bread Sun-Times. 19 July. 2006 . Murtha?s arcsecond Act. June 2006. Real Clear Politics. 22 June. 2006 . Robert Novak. July 2006. Wikipedia. 20 July. 2006 . If you want to motor a full essay, ordinate it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.