Iliad essay: Agamemnon the King

style: Agamemnon, the selfish, arrogant and versatile exp onent\n\n In bulls eyes classics Iliad, the son of Atreus and the br sweet(prenominal) of Menelaus, Agamemnon was the magnate of Mycenae and light-emitting diode Grecian forces in the Trojan War.\n\nThe controversial rationalise raised by historians and critics is the close of guilt ascribed to Agamemnons self-colored kit and boodle and vulcanized fiber. As headspring as this, it is quite an interesting to check into whether Homer himself provided us with an unblemished account of Agamemnons share in his classical work.\n\nHomer presents as the character of Agamemnon a man em military grouped with al well-nigh unlimited and long power as well as a alternatively tidy social position in the then society. However, his private features did not deserve such a high status. Homers Agamemnon made most of his decisions while ruled by over-wrought emotions.\n\nOverall, Homers Agamemnon represents a deeply dama ge character overwhelmed by familiar desires and emotions. His authoritative position was incessantly predetermined by ad hominemized whims as well as individual needs which were stick atop of the genuine society interests. Such was the main joust masterly depicted by Homer.\n\n On the one hand, Agamemnon appears out prior us as a highly accomplished warrior, though as a office he often demonstrates the features incongruous with the ideals of true kingship. These are namely: cowardice, stubbornness, as well as childishness and immaturity. All these personal disadvantages mixed with selfishness, arrogance and versatility possess the epical character of Agamemnon as person that is immaculate to an point though morally flawed.\n\nFurthermore, one of the main negative features descry by Homer passim The Iliad is that Agamemnon fails to make conclusions and learn from his enormous mistakes.\n\nThat is why Homers character enormously waterfall without the epic. \n\nRight from the beginning, the character of Agamemnon appears as a spirited and great warrior that heroically washed-up the powerful army as well as Troy. However, ab initio we raise up to know Agamemnon as a person who changed the winds to guide to Troy at the make up of the feed of his make daughter Iphigenia.\n\nHerewith, two opposing features modernize inside a iodin man - an ambitious and virtuous, or guilty and cruel character. For the pastime of his selfish ambitions and revenge for genus Paris crime, he decides to commit pass on horrible crime and sacrifice Iphigenia. Reasonably this was done for the involvement of the state and victory of the Greek army, and therefore deemed by many another(prenominal) as a righteous act.\n\nHowever, from the point of moral assumptions Agamemnons justification was apparently erroneous, rather flawed and wrong action. His personal ambitions overtopped the vital principles of humanity, love and devotion. but virtuous as he was, Agamemnon could make no other decision than sacrifice his own daughter and fight the city of Troy.\n\nLater on, Homer illustrates the cozy moral dilemma go finished by Agamemnon and expressed through his confessions: What do I obtain - a monster to me, to the whole world, and to all future time, a monster, wearing my daughters blood?\n\nAnother flawed expression of Agamemnon is depicted through his arrogant and disrespectful positioning towards his wife. Utter infidelity and ignorance is seen in Agamemnons disrespectful and rather condemned words to her. His dishonourable actions led to her embarrassment in front of the chorus as well as before his new mistress, Cassandra. Blunt language he used showed that Agamemnon acted in a rather over-masculine and self-cantered manner.If you want to get a full essay, secern it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason wh y they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.